In this line of research, I examine how a target's characteristics influence the expression of bias. Specifically, I am interested in how multiple intersecting social identities modify susceptibility to bias and discriminatory treatment. I test these questions using intersectional invisibility theory (Purdie-Vaughns & Eibach, 2008). This theory posits that we have cultural defaults that align with group status when we thinking of social categories. Thus, the default person is likely White, male, and heterosexual.
I extend this theory to examine the prototypes at the intersection of race and (a) sexual orientation (Lei, Mohr, Rucker, & Richeson, in prep) and (b) socioeconomic status (SES) (Lei & Bodenhausen, 2017). Furthermore, I investigate what the implications of viewing prototypical vs. non-prototypical exemplars are for policy outcomes. I also examine these associations between social categories on a group-level (Lei, Petsko, Rucker, & Richeson, in prep).
From the target's perspective, I investigate the implications of being prototypical or non-prototypical for people's identification with the overall social group and consequently for collective action intentions (Lei & Richeson, in prep).
All together, these research projects are aimed at understanding the complexity of social identification and the implications of this complexity in an increasingly diverse society.
Create your own unique website with customizable templates.